Plighted Troth

Does not shoot laser beams or hypnotise the viewer
This is my engagement ring, on my finger. It was designed and made by Deanna Gracie, a jewellery designer and exhibitor whose blog you can read here. Wearing it is giving me a lot of pleasure; you may even find me striking those kind of fingertips-on-face poses typically seen on knitting patterns from a bygone era.
I wanted, and did not want, a ring, often at the same time. The heritage of chattelhood at which first-wave feminism chipped away (sometimes with a very large chisel) is in an engagement ring, as is its contemporary echo of adorned women, for whom, the canon of R&B and hip-hop-lite tells us, the receipt and wearing of jewellery is a primary goal.
At the same time, I thought of the rings and brooches my grandfather gave my grandmother, the pleasure he took in giving them and the pride with which they were worn. (Some of this jewellery is now in my possession.) I thought of the engagement ring my father had recast for my mother, having learned some time in the past some hard life lessons from the previous engagement that his friends and family thought would be best for him. I thought, as you can see, of the way that jewellery accrues stories through the passing of time, and how the wearing of a ring is part of that story not just of purchase and display, but also of making a choice, maintaining that choice and being together through this. The ring is a synecdoche but its detail is in many ways in the control of the señor and me.
Deanna’s beautiful designs grew on us, particularly the in-drawing of the local to the inherited tradition of jewellery making. I liked particularly the eschewing in her craft of the traditional signifiers of commitment: no diamonds and only small amounts of gold (with a concomittantly sensible price). I am content, too, with the public status my wearing the ring gives our relationship, that people stop and ask me about it, that it is a beautiful object. It becomes part of a story of small and lovely things we have bought together, a sort of domestic commerce that tells, I hope, a lovers’ modest tale.
December 19, 2008 at 4:18 pm
You two got it goin’ awn. Love it.
December 19, 2008 at 4:41 pm
You got a r-ing.
A boy lo-ves you.
He wants to mar-ry you.
December 19, 2008 at 5:55 pm
That’s a gorgeous ring. It’s got a beautiful stylish simplicity about it. Very nice.
I love my wedding ring. It’s completely plain 9 carat gold and it cost maybe $150. My husband has a matching one. We got married as extremely poor students and we had to save to buy those rings. In fact we set the date of our wedding based on when we had saved enough for those rings and the registry office fee. We could replace them now, if we chose to, but new rings wouldn’t have anything like as much meaning.
December 19, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Good on your for not getting a diamond! A ring that’s made by a designer whose work you like is going to say far more to you than any mall jeweller bling fest ring ever could.
And I like that you’re thinking about it in terms of an heirloom. That’s what marriage is about – whanau!
December 19, 2008 at 7:25 pm
It’s a very elegant ring, and it’s story is already a good one.
I rather like rings, and my partner has gotten very good at choosing them for me. Mostly inexpensive, but beautiful. My favourite is a round bead of amber in a chunkyish (in a small sort of way) silver setting, which he brought back from a work trip to Mexico.
December 19, 2008 at 10:20 pm
What Merc said.
December 20, 2008 at 2:16 pm
OMG, OMG, OMG, its here, its finally here!!!! I’ve gone all squeally!!!
December 20, 2008 at 10:50 pm
What Giovanni said.
December 21, 2008 at 1:43 pm
merc & sas: thank you! My inner 19-year old (who wished for it going on) and inner 9-year old (who wondered if she could stick a cherry blossom branch through her bun to femme it up a little more) are well sated.
MTNW: I love your story. This ring was in the range of the price of your two rings, rather than the three months’ salary or whatever ball-breaking price the diamond industry suggests. I think objects that gain value from their context are just as dear as those that are otherwise dear. One doesn’t want to sing J-Lo’s “My Love Don’t Cost a Thing”, but one could if one wanted.
Robyn: thank you! Some of my favourite family stories are about the things my grandfather bought my grandmother when they were first going out. She was only 16 and had grown up poor. His first demonstration of commitment was to buy them each a bicycle, so they could have outings together at the weekends. The bicycles are long gone but we still have the photos of my grandmother posing with hers, looking cute as anything, as you can imagine.
Deborah: I am a fan of rings in general too. I think a ring from Mexico would be a wonderful gift. I have one other ring I wear regularly, which is a signet with my mother’s initials. She was given it for being a bridesmaid at a friend’s wedding, but the marriage didn’t last. I particularly like it because her initials are those prior to her own wedding. I’m quite content with our family name but it’s also good to have something of her before she became Mrs. Bird.
sienna: are you having the matron of honour vapours? Do I need to get some smelling salts and a picture of MS to bring you round?
Giovanni and Paul: you are a pair of duffers.